I see a contradiction in responses to the murder of Laquan
McDonald by Police: On the one hand we
speak of this as an example of racist structure and system in place on the
other we say it is the problem of certain individuals: officer West as a bad apple,
States Attorney Alverez misconduct in the execution of her office, the Chief of
Police and Mayor Rahm Emmanuel. When we
want to explain how this effects people of color and is an example of how law enforcement
treats Blacks and people of color we speak systemic racism, and the racist
structures and policing as part of that system.
Yet, when we speak of reform at least in the case of Laquan McDonald we
focus on the individuals in the system, and removing from office those who we
believe should have responded differently.
However, if the system in which these individuals work is
racist, if the structure of policing is bound up in the history of racism
(racism being structural and not bound to the attitudes of an individual human
beings, which is what it means to speak of the system of racism and racist
structures) then in singling out these public officials we are at just removing
those who acted most overtly within the system doing what the system encourages
and even demands. We are also, then rewarding
those who adept in perpetuating the ends of the system in underhanded and
covert ways and able to perpetuate the system while adapting it to certain
demands for reform.
I understand the contradiction: We want to put a name to
things we find shocking and which peak our conscience, and in putting a name to
it we also want the named problem solved. The removal and resignation of public
officials feels like something has been done to solve the systemic
problem. But, none of those officials
could have done what they did if the system didn’t support their actions. The cover up was an act of the system not
merely the individuals.
After all this is what it means to talk about systems and
structures: there are mechanisms and policies in place that sanction and
empower a certain set of affairs without the needing the overt or active assent
of individual actors.
What we have in the case of Laquan McDonald is certain
officials acting out overtly and obviously what the system wishes to keep low
key and sublimated. But those officials
we wish to remove from office were simply enacting the systemic and structural
realities they just that in the case of Laquan McDonald’s murder and the
handling of the investigation we simply have the extreme manifestation of the
system.
But we don’t change the system simply by removing those
actors.
This shouldn’t mean that we don’t call for them to resign
and work towards removing them, but in doing so we shouldn’t think that another
individual will make the difference, and we have thus solved the problem. We
then need to go and look at the root of the problem in policing itself and in
the state and city structures themselves.
It’s much tidier to believe this is an issue of a group of
bad apples, but if it is systemic and structural then those aren’t bad apples
they are simply the fruit of the system that we see exposed today in how
policing in this country treats blacks and people of color.
No comments:
Post a Comment