Saturday, October 13, 2007

Ann Coulter on Christianity and Judaism

I generally ignore Ann Coulter. She has always seemed to me to be purely sensationalist and for that reason unworthy of comment or attention. However, when she claims to speak for Christianity as if all Republicans are Christians (or even that some Republicans would be exemplary Christians) and then in answer to a question about what America would look like essentially says everyone should be Christian, and then speaks of Christianity as perfected Judaism (which is a poor way of speaking of the way the relationship of Christianity and Judaism is viewed from a Christian perspective.), then it is time to take notice.

I think Christians should not defend her stick figure presentation of Christian faith, but point out her jingoistic notions of Christianity, and the ways in which she seems to use Christianity for her own ends which are truly unclear to me, except as a means for notoriety and celebrity. She clearly has an understanding of the Politics and of Christian faith. Its not that she doesn't know what she is saying. Rather she says things to project an image of of herself and a particular distortion of Christian faith, that at points sounds both right and wrong at the same time. She believes in an image of herself, as some defender of American Christianity.

This confusion of nationalism and Christians faith of American Christianity that I think people should be actually up in arms about, even evangelical and conservative Christians. If she weren't talking about politics and power and America as a nation, Her comments would simply be a fairly facile and lacking in nuance (but true) description of a theological view of the relationship between Judaism and Christianity. The problem with her remarks is that they approximate (I use that word deliberately) the rhetoric and POV of German Christianity of Nazi Germany. However not as a simple reiteration of that either in its antisemitism nor even in logical outcome. Its approximation is in the deliberate mixing of Christian faith (or what passes for Christian faith) and a nationalist agenda that seeks to equate patriotism with Christian faith. Her comments are frightening because we know where such rhetoric and out look can go though I would say her comments are not nor should they be read through the lenses of Nazi antisemitism.

The problem isn't antisemitism of her remarks but her confusion of nationalism and faith as if to be an American and to be a Christian can and should always be the same thing. Of course part of what makes it so easy for such confusion to take place and for it to go largely unnoticed and commented upon is that confusion of the Church with Christianity or Christendom, and that many Christians especially Protestants of any stripe rarely make a distinction between these and not infrequently use these terms more or less interchangeably. In fact I have been caught in this linguistic quagmire even in this post. You see technically for Coulter to have been right (sorry Young Fogey but she is wrong though partially correct) she needed to speak of the Church, the Body of Christ, as the one people of God which God began to gather with the creation of the people of Israel. This Body of Christ the Church cannot be confused with American Christianity, nor the Christianity of Marcion, or any other form of Christianity that attaches itself to this world and its power politics which are passing away.

From my view she speaks truth the way many heretics do: by getting some things right while speaking distortions of the truth that are hard to pick out because they sound kind of true or only a little bit off. Let's remember that the Anti-Jewish Marcion was attempting to both make Christianity be something native and powerful to the culture and attempting to defend his notions of God against criticism, and was a Christian. My point is not that Coulter is a Gnostic or anti-Jewish in the way Marcion was but that she is a heretic (with her own American heresy) like he was and like all German Christians were. We should be concerned that these distortions can be perceived as the truth. If we must defend the kernel of truth in her statement we should not do it in the context of discussing her comments. If we have any love for the Church and orthodox catholic Christianity we should stay as far away from appearing to defend Coulter or her remarks about Judaism as we possibly can, because taken in their entire context her remarks are an heretical distortion of what ever truth she may have spoken.

4 comments:

  1. Yes, We (Christians) seem to forget that Jesus said we were not of this world and that His kingdom was not of this world. It seems that taking control of the government would mean that we are lowering our expectations. We should serve as good citizens and vote and run for office as the Lord leads. But if these things draw attention to you instead of Christ, then you are wrong.

    And Christ is neither Rep or Dem. Jesus spoke of caring for the poor and such more than gay rights and abortion. They only thing we need to concern ourselves about is loving our enemies and each other. And caring for those who can not take care of themse;lves.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Caring for the poor has spiritual value if done by individuals. Being robbed by government so then government can give some of the booty to the poor has nothing to do with Christianity.

    Jesus teaches that everyone CAN take care of themselves because it is the Holy Spirit guiding inside each person. When government starts giving handouts, the incentive is lost to hear the Holy Spirit.

    Why is the writer of this article so fearful of the Holy Spirit guiding people? Does FEAR represent Christianity?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wayne,
    Thanks for your comment. Though, it deals with my post tangentially. Though I disagree with Ann Coulter's politics it really isn't that she as a Christian supports the Republican party, it is that she equates the two specifically in her comments that lead her to say that Jews had to be come Christians to be perfected.
    Also, I am not sure that all a Christian should be concerned about is the poor, though faith in Jesus Christ should lead to that, as it should lead one to be prepared to confront the powers that be.
    And your last thing really more has to do with evangelical Christians and I think Ann Coulter shouldn't be equated with them. My hope would be the evangelicals could recognize that this tendency of mixing nationalism and Christianity betrays their own orthodoxy.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Christian Prophet,
    I can see we are going to disagree.
    I will answer your points though I don't see how they have anything to do with my remarks about Ann Coulter's recent statements. The subject she addressed had nothing to do with poverty or what have you. Also, your comment seems to assume that I am probably a Democrat. I am not. Why wont you address my point which is Coulter's conflation of nationalism, politics and religion, which makes being a good American and a good Christian in her eyes synonymous. Redistribution of wealth is not necessarily theft. Unless you believe that Christianity teaches that private property is inviolable and sacred. (which btw it doesn't.) True the entering into the Kingdom of God is an act of the Holy Spirit.
    Also, I'd like to see actual text and quotation to back up this statement of yours "Jesus teaches that everyone CAN take care of themselves because it is the Holy Spirit guiding inside each person."
    That simply sounds like enlightenment and capitalist individualism dressed up with Christian words like Jesus and Holy Spirit. Jesus did not teach individualism, please show me where he teaches this strange doctrine of yours.
    I am not fearful of the Holy Spirit guiding people. We are told by the Apostle to discern the spirits. I am fairly confident that the Holy Spirit was not the source of Ann Coulter's words that are the subject of this post. Given her antics and sensationalist persona if she is truly a Christian she certainly has access to the Spirit though like many heretics has chosen her own opinions. Thankfully she doesn't claim that what she says is of the Holy Spirit. It seems strange that you would mistake critique for "fear". Certainly you believe there are means for discerning whether what one says does is under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. And from your comments you must think that I am not speaking from that guidance, does that mean you fear the Holy Spirit in me? I think your answer would be no. So mine is also no to you. I don't fear the guidance of the Holy Spirit in others, I just don't see evidence of that guidance in Ann Coulter.
    BTW my one use of the word "frightening" was not speaking of my own state but of those who have reacted to Coulter's words about Judaism. I was not saying we should be afraid.

    ReplyDelete